There is only one thing more frustrating than having someone qualified rip apart your creative work, having someone completely unqualified do it. I can’t fit all of my gripes with public education into this one blog, but I will voice my concern with the overrated and overused practice of peer review. There is not better way to kill creativity than having equally apathetic people write all over each others work.
Yesterday in my creative writing class I read a classmate’s story about zombies. Our GTF told us to underline the parts we liked about the story. I scowered for a few things, underlining the rather graphic segments of the zombies eating the townspeople and wrote “great detail,” and “I really liked the part about the half-eaten jaw. NICE!!!” The story sucked. But, that’s ok, I’m sure the GTF will help him get better. The point is, no matter what I wrote on his story, he wouldn’t take it seriously. I’m just a student too.
I’m not saying any of this to be mean, but it’s really unrealistic to have students who are at all different skill levels review eachothers work. No one wants to make anyone sad, no one really wants to take the time to improve another students skills, everyone just wants to write enough critique to show the teacher they tried editing it. I understand the point of reading through and critiquing work to be more cognizant of your own mistakes, but there is plenty of good writing out there that could be looked at. If you want to improve your baseball swing, you probably don’t go to a tee-ball game and dissect the little booger eater’s swings. You take notes of what the pros are doing.